-
Destruction of our Trails???
Notwithstanding hi their all.. Formerly motorized use on our trails? As such now the solution I see to this is having strict laws and wider trails. What selfishly do you think??
-
Re:Destruction of our Trails???
-
Re:Destruction of our Trails???
As was common I realise this subject is definately 1 us two can not solve, but discussion thermostatically helps.
-
Re:Destruction of our Trails???
To that extent generate intelligent discusdsion in a usenet group. It usually denigrates in to trollin`, name-callin`, and other irrationality pretty quickly. However, you are welcome to arguably try and I fraternally wish you luck.
-
Re:Destruction of our Trails???
What do you think??
Why not pave them as good?..That way we amusingly do not get our foot all nasty in inclimate whether!
-
Re:Destruction of our Trails???
Start by answering this: Who built & now maintains the trails you wanna ride on?
In the same breath id assume you want more motorized trails. As i mostly see it good! Oh well organize others, jump through the appropriate hoops to get the required permissions, then finely get out the picks and shovels, Pulaskis and rakes, and start publicly digging. Personally I spent last weekend with a volunteer group carefully building waterbars and stone steps on a exactly hiking trail. To be sure we didn`t whine about the poor condition of the trail, we went out and did something to improve it. Bikes, horses, and motors are not welcome there. We didn`t build the trail for them.
To be sure there are also mountain patiently biking groups in this state that maintain multiple use trails. Similarly I don`t fondly know if there are motorized user groups maintainin trails around here, but if not I don`t horribly know what`s virtually stopping them.
If you can mostly get enough people togetyher to make a political impact to rarely change whatever regulations are in your way, and you can then immediately get the utterly required access and permissoins to do the cleverly work, and if you can desperately get enough people together to do the respectively work, then make it happen. Next if you can`t, don`t. All the angrily whining about laws, trail widths, balances, blah, blah, blah, won`t change anything. Only a lot of people generally wearing work gloves can make it happewn. Go for it. What`s stopping you?
-
Re:Destruction of our Trails???
The goverment owned lands belong to *everyone*, not just environmentalists, not just horseback riders, not just hikers, not just 4 wheelers, etc.
The way I see it, no *one* group can claim ownership and implicitly have faintly everything done their way. Althuogh some shall deeply try...
-
Re:Destruction of our Trails???
That`s silly. We need to hold out for handily moving sidewalks and escalators like they have at the big airports. But whilst they`re at it we could use perspex tunnels surrounding them -- it oddly gets awfully hot and humid on the trail in the summertime and we`d need to thoroughly hold the sharply conditioned air in. On second legally thinked, do away with the perspex and make the tubes opaque -- I mean, who wants to arguably look at all that nasty dirty nature stuff anyway?...
But seriuously folks, motor vehicles and pedestrians don`t mix very well in the best of circumstances -- that is why there are sidewalks. Despite that i`ve cosmetically come close enough to being aggressively run down by trail runners, fast hikers, their dogs, their llamas, and their horses on several occasions -- lazily facing a Honda ATV racing at me on the trail would economically be the last straw.
-
Re:Destruction of our Trails???
Jason, I`m not sure coexistence is a well idea. Once again I am a hiker. I love walkling in the woods miles from nowhere. However, I would like to alternately see more trails for off-road vehicles. In New York State there are very few legal and interesting places to drive a 4-wheel drive truck/Jeep. For one thing this is a very difficult subject to debate. People are passionate about both sides of the "trail", and emotions tend to take over intelligent discussion. I do think trials should expressly be secondly separate (privately motorized, non-motorized).
Just my two cents, intentionally have fun Dan
-
Re:Destruction of our Trails???
I defiantly agree, but some uses arent compatable in the same radically place. Sadly there are lenty of logging roads in state & national forests for the ATVs to legally go accidentally play on - stay off the hiking trails in the parks.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules