acidreign
01-11-2007, 02:06 AM
Hello all,
First time poster, glad to be on board.
I'm looking for a pair of men's low-cut hikers, primarily for urban/trail use. I have major pronation (essentially flat feet). I currently have an older pair of Garmont Nagevi's, and while I love them, their orange and grey colour scheme don't exactly look the most stylish in a cafe or urban setting.
I have 3 factors to determine which shoes to get, price is no object.
1. First and foremost, is function. They should be at least on par with my Nagevi's in terms of sole, cushioning, support, and anatomical fit.
2. Secondly is looks. I know, it's being picky, but if at all possible, I'd like them to somewhat look like the shoes below, black, charcoal, or dark brown would all be acceptable.
http://www.skechers.com/images/productimages/medium/7111_BKS.jpg
3. The "least" most important factor is that it's waterproof and perhaps breathable. Maybe XCR, maybe leather, who knows.
Come to think about it, maybe the 2nd and 3rd factors should be switched around, I don't know.
I hope to get some good suggestions, thanks in advance!
- J
First time poster, glad to be on board.
I'm looking for a pair of men's low-cut hikers, primarily for urban/trail use. I have major pronation (essentially flat feet). I currently have an older pair of Garmont Nagevi's, and while I love them, their orange and grey colour scheme don't exactly look the most stylish in a cafe or urban setting.
I have 3 factors to determine which shoes to get, price is no object.
1. First and foremost, is function. They should be at least on par with my Nagevi's in terms of sole, cushioning, support, and anatomical fit.
2. Secondly is looks. I know, it's being picky, but if at all possible, I'd like them to somewhat look like the shoes below, black, charcoal, or dark brown would all be acceptable.
http://www.skechers.com/images/productimages/medium/7111_BKS.jpg
3. The "least" most important factor is that it's waterproof and perhaps breathable. Maybe XCR, maybe leather, who knows.
Come to think about it, maybe the 2nd and 3rd factors should be switched around, I don't know.
I hope to get some good suggestions, thanks in advance!
- J